Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
A federal appeals court has reinstated a lawsuit filed by 4 former detainees of Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison thanks in part to Rutgers Law School professor Jeena Shah who played a key role in reviving the case.
The plaintiffs’ lawyers, including Shah, who oversees the law school’s International Human Rights Clinic, argued the case should be allowed to go forward. The former detainees say they were tortured in 2003 at the direction of a U.S. military contractor.
Shah, along with attorneys from the Center for Constitutional Rights and Patterson Belknap Webb and Tyler LP, argued before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va. in May, after the suit was thrown out by a U.S. District Court judge. Students from the clinic helped draft the brief submitted to the appeals court, conducted research, and helped prepare the legal team for oral arguments.
“The ruling is significant because it discredits the Bush-era theories of torture by affirming that torture is illegal and no one –– not even the President – can make it legal,” Shah said this week of the court victory. She has been working on the 2008 case since 2012 and got Rutgers students involved last fall. The reinstatement means the case will go back to U.S. District Court.
In June 2015, U.S. District Court Judge Gerald Bruce Lee dismissed the case, saying the lawsuit raised a political question that was improper for the judiciary to decide, because it would require second-guessing military leaders in a war zone.
Lee has since recused himself from the case.
According to the suit, the detainees say they were “softened up” for interrogations through torture, including being subject to severe beatings, sexual assault, and electric shocks, among other forms of mistreatment. They were never charged with any crime. Some of the interrogators at the detention facility were supplied by CACI Premier Technology, Inc., an Arlington-based contractor.
“What our clients describe, amounts to torture and war crimes under international law,” Shah said. It was the fourth time the case has been before the court of appeals.
“There is no question that torture is unlawful under domestic, military, and international law. The only issue in this case is whether CACI will be held accountable – or treated with impunity – for its role in torture at Abu Ghraib,” Center for Constitutional Rights Legal Director Baher Azmy said in a prepared statement.
“The decision reaffirms the role of the courts to assess illegality, including torture, and we are optimistic this case will finally move forward and our clients will have their day in court,” he said.
The case, Al Shimari v. Premier Technology was filed in June 2008 under the Alien Tort Statute (which allows non-citizens to sue for human rights violations committed abroad. In 2014, the Fourth Circuit overturned a lower-court ruling that would have barred the Abu Ghraib survivors from accessing U.S. courts to sue U.S. corporations involved in torture.
The Fourth Circuit Court reversed, determining that the case sufficiently “touch[es] and concern[s]” the United States “with sufficient force” to overcome the “presumption against extraterritorial application” of the ATS recognized by the Supreme Court in 2013.
Shah, who has been working on the case since 2012, has practiced as an international human rights attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights, where she represented foreign victims of human rights violations.
She also worked in Haiti and India with local civil rights and human rights offices. Previously she worked on complex commercial, civil rights, and international human rights litigation at a firm in New York City.
The post Abu Ghraib Detainees’ Case Revived Thanks To Rutgers Professor Shah appeared first on News India Times.